Russell Edward Williams v. Officer Massey, Officer Woodale, Officer Jones

872 F.2d 420, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 3461, 1989 WL 29517
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 22, 1989·No. 88-6786·Unpublished

Opinion

872 F.2d 420
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Russell Edward WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Officer MASSEY, Officer Woodale, Officer Jones, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 88-6786.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 31, 1989.
Decided March 22, 1989.

Russell Edward Williams, appellant pro se.

Gordon Claiborne Woodruff, Harron, O'Hale, Whittington & Woodruff, Pa, William Ross Britt, for appellees.

Before WIDENER and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Russell Edward Williams appeals from the district court order, entered pursuant to a jury verdict, denying him relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record discloses that this appeal is without merit. Williams has failed to show that the jury's verdict was not supported by substantial evidence or that he was prejudiced by any of the trial errors he alleges. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court. We deny Williams' request for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell Edward Williams v. Officer Massey, Officer Woodale, Officer Jones, 872 F.2d 420, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 3461, 1989 WL 29517 (4th Cir. 1989).

872 F.2d 420 (Russell Edward Williams v. Officer Massey, Officer Woodale, Officer Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related