RUSSELL DURDEN v. DYCK-O'NEAL, INC.
This text of RUSSELL DURDEN v. DYCK-O'NEAL, INC. (RUSSELL DURDEN v. DYCK-O'NEAL, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
RUSSELL DURDEN, Appellant,
v.
DYCK-O'NEAL, INC., Appellee.
No. 4D18-3050
[October 10, 2019]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Barbara W. Bronis, Judge; L.T. Case No. 14-000742 CAAXMX.
Dane T. Stanish of Law Offices of Dane Stanish, P.A., Hollywood, for appellant.
David M. Snyder, Tampa, and Joshua D. Moore of Law Offices of Daniel C. Consuegra, Tampa, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
TAYLOR, MAY and FORST, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
RUSSELL DURDEN v. DYCK-O'NEAL, INC., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russell-durden-v-dyck-oneal-inc-fladistctapp-2019.