Russell Davis v. State
This text of Russell Davis v. State (Russell Davis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-09-00602-CR
Russell DAVIS, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the County Court at Law No 1, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 247819 The Honorable Micheal La Hood, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Rebecca Simmons, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice
Delivered and Filed: January 27, 2010
DISMISSED
On December 15, 2009, we notified Appellant that the trial court’s certification in this
appeal states that “this criminal case is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of
appeal.” Additionally, the clerk’s record contained a written waiver signed by the appellant
pursuant to which he entered a plea of no contest. The trial court’s judgment also reflected that
there was a plea bargain agreement, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment
recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant; therefore, the trial court’s 04-09-00602-CR
certification accurately reflected that the criminal case is a plea-bargain case. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 25.2(a)(2).
Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides, “The appeal must be
dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has a right of appeal has not been made part
of the record under these rules.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). We, therefore, ordered that this appeal
would be dismissed pursuant to rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure unless
appellant caused an amended trial court certification to be filed by January 4, 2010, showing
appellant has the right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); 37.1; see also Dears v. State, 154
S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio
2003, no pet.). No response has been received by this court. We, therefore, dismiss this appeal
in accordance with Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.
DO NOT PUBLISH
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Russell Davis v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russell-davis-v-state-texapp-2010.