Russell Charles Taylor v. United States

Sixth Circuit

Russell Charles Taylor v. United States

199 F.2d 373

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedOctober 27, 1952

Docket11590_1

StatusPublished

This text of 199 F.2d 373 (Russell Charles Taylor v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Russell Charles Taylor v. United States, 199 F.2d 373 (6th Cir. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard on the transcript of record, the 'briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel iti open court; and it appearing that there was no error in the ■ admission of evidence or any rulings thereon by the trial court;’ and that the conviction of appellant was sustained iby • the evidence;

And it appearing further that the District Court was not in error and did not-abuse its discretion in refusing to sentence appellant in accordance with the provisions of Title 18 U.S.C.A. § 5010, known as the Youth Offenders Act; and the court being duly advised;

Now, therefore, it is ordered, that the judgment of the District Court be and is hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard on the transcript of record, the 'briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel iti open court; and it appearing that there was no error in the ■ admission of evidence or any rulings thereon by the trial court;’ and that the conviction of appellant was sustained iby • the evidence;

And it appearing further that the District Court was not in error and did not-abuse its discretion in refusing to sentence appellant in accordance with the provisions of Title 18 U.S.C.A. § 5010, known as the Youth Offenders Act; and the court being duly advised;

Now, therefore, it is ordered, that the judgment of the District Court be and is hereby affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

199 F.2d 373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russell-charles-taylor-v-united-states-ca6-1952.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack