Russell C. Lind v. John W. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare

434 F.2d 1313
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 28, 1971
Docket23883_1
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 434 F.2d 1313 (Russell C. Lind v. John W. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Russell C. Lind v. John W. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare, 434 F.2d 1313 (9th Cir. 1971).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In 1964 the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare terminated Lind’s *1314 disability insurance benefits because the Department decided that Lind was capable of engaging in “substantial gainful activity.” 1 42 U.S.C. §§ 416(i), 423. This decision was affirmed by the agency upon reconsideration, by an examiner after a de novo hearing, and by the Department Appeals Council. Lind sought relief in the District Court and now appeals from a summary judgment upholding the Department’s decision. 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

From the record before us, we cannot say that the challenged administrative decision was not supported by substantial evidence. 2

Affirmed.

1

. In 1961, when he first received the disability benefits, Lind was diagnosed as a chronic schizophrenic with reactions of the paranoid type who also suffered from heart trouble in the form of angina pectoris. In 1964, however, there was no evidence of a heart condition and his paranoia was in remission. He had a passive-dependent type of approach to life.

2

. One doctor noted that Lind was not mentally retarded and could manage his own funds. Although several physicians believed that Lind’s schizophrenia with a paranoiac reaction in partial remission was permanent, one distinguished psychiatrist expressed the opinion that Lind could work in a restricted environment where there was a minimum of social contact. She stated that “[i]f motivation could be achieved to some degree, Mr. Lind, because of his capacity to reason and plan and pursue such planning should have many years of productivity left to pursue.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
434 F.2d 1313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russell-c-lind-v-john-w-gardner-secretary-of-health-education-ca9-1971.