Russell C. Johnson and Crest-Craft Company v. Harold Dorsey
260 F.2d 313
Opinion
This cause came on to be heard on the oral arguments and printed briefs of the contending attorneys and on the record in the case;
And it appearing that there is not merit in the points of alleged error urged by appellants; and that the submission to the jury of defendant’s Exhibit No. 4 —produced for identification and not formally introduced in evidence — was harmless, especially in view of the fact that the exhibit was read to the jury;
The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Russell C. Johnson and Crest-Craft Company v. Harold Dorsey, 260 F.2d 313 (6th Cir. 1958).
260 F.2d 313 (Russell C. Johnson and Crest-Craft Company v. Harold Dorsey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Alonzo Allen Bunn v. United States of America, (Two Cases)
260 F.2d 313 (Eighth Circuit, 1958)