Russell C. Johnson and Crest-Craft Company v. Harold Dorsey
This text of 260 F.2d 313 (Russell C. Johnson and Crest-Craft Company v. Harold Dorsey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This cause came on to be heard on the oral arguments and printed briefs of the contending attorneys and on the record in the case;
And it appearing that there is not merit in the points of alleged error urged by appellants; and that the submission to the jury of defendant’s Exhibit No. 4 —produced for identification and not formally introduced in evidence — was harmless, especially in view of the fact that the exhibit was read to the jury;
The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
260 F.2d 313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russell-c-johnson-and-crest-craft-company-v-harold-dorsey-ca6-1958.