Russell B. Jacobs v. United States
This text of 341 F.2d 890 (Russell B. Jacobs v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We have carefully reviewed the evidence to sustain the verdict of the jury as to this appellant and find it more than sufficient to authorize the jury to find a verdict of guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
We do not find prejudicial error in the criticized comment of the United States Attorney about appellant being “associated” in business with Mary Collins. The proof that an initial from this lady’s name was used to form the name R & M Mortgage Co. was sufficient to warrant an inference that she was “associated” with the business.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
341 F.2d 890, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russell-b-jacobs-v-united-states-ca5-1965.