Russell Amsberry v. Alejandra Salazar

Court of Appeals of Texas

Russell Amsberry v. Alejandra Salazar

DecidedJanuary 24, 2018

Docket04-17-00704-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Russell Amsberry v. Alejandra Salazar (Russell Amsberry v. Alejandra Salazar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Russell Amsberry v. Alejandra Salazar, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 24, 2018

No. 04-17-00704-CV

Russell AMSBERRY, Appellant

v.

Alejandra SALAZAR, Appellee

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2011-CI-17196 The Honorable Angelica Jimenez, Judge Presiding

ORDER Appellant has filed a Motion to Correct Supersedeas Bond Amount and For Stay of Post- Judgment Discovery, in which he argues the trial court has erred in setting the amount of supersedeas bond. Additionally, appellant requests that we stay execution of the judgment and post-judgment discovery in this matter pending our review of the supersedeas bond amount. We grant appellant’s request to stay execution of the judgment and post-judgment discovery pending our review of the supersedeas bond. The execution of the judgment and all post-judgment discovery is stayed in this matter pending further other from this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 24.4(c).

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 25th day of January, 2018.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE, Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 24, 2018

No. 04-17-00704-CV

Russell AMSBERRY, Appellant

v.

Alejandra SALAZAR, Appellee

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2011-CI-17196 The Honorable Angelica Jimenez, Judge Presiding

ORDER Appellant has filed a Motion to Correct Supersedeas Bond Amount and For Stay of Post- Judgment Discovery, in which he argues the trial court has erred in setting the amount of supersedeas bond. Additionally, appellant requests that we stay execution of the judgment and post-judgment discovery in this matter pending our review of the supersedeas bond amount. We grant appellant’s request to stay execution of the judgment and post-judgment discovery pending our review of the supersedeas bond. The execution of the judgment and all post-judgment discovery is stayed in this matter pending further other from this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 24.4(c).

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 25th day of January, 2018.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE, Clerk of Court

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Russell Amsberry v. Alejandra Salazar, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russell-amsberry-v-alejandra-salazar-texapp-2018.