Russell A. Lane v. United States Parole Commission

39 F.3d 1177, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 38095, 1994 WL 632481
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 14, 1994·No. 94-6641·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

39 F.3d 1177

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Russell A. LANE, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, Defendant Appellee.

No. 94-6641.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 18, 1994.
Decided Nov. 14, 1994.

Russell A. Lane, Appellant Pro Se. Rebeca Olivia Hidalgo, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, VA, for Appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lane v. United States Parole Comm'n, No. CA-93-924 (E.D. Va. May 12, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell A. Lane v. United States Parole Commission, 39 F.3d 1177, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 38095, 1994 WL 632481 (4th Cir. 1994).

39 F.3d 1177 (Russell A. Lane v. United States Parole Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lane v. Kindt
97 F.3d 1464 (Tenth Circuit, 1996)