Russell A. Lane v. United States Parole Commission
This text of 39 F.3d 1177 (Russell A. Lane v. United States Parole Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
39 F.3d 1177
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Russell A. LANE, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, Defendant Appellee.
No. 94-6641.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 18, 1994.
Decided Nov. 14, 1994.
Russell A. Lane, Appellant Pro Se. Rebeca Olivia Hidalgo, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, VA, for Appellee.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lane v. United States Parole Comm'n, No. CA-93-924 (E.D. Va. May 12, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
39 F.3d 1177, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 38095, 1994 WL 632481, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russell-a-lane-v-united-states-parole-commission-ca4-1994.