Russel v. Armador

2 Cal. 305
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 15, 1852
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 2 Cal. 305 (Russel v. Armador) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Russel v. Armador, 2 Cal. 305 (Cal. 1852).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Justice Heydenfeldt.

Section 180, chap. 5 of the Practice

Act prescribes, that “upon the trial of an issue of fact by the Court, its decisions shall be given in writing, and filed with the clerk within ten days after the trial took place. In giving the decision, the facts found and the conclusions of law shall be separately stated. Judgment upon the decision shall be executed accordingly.”

We are of opinion that this law is not merely directory, and we have no right to destroy or impair its efficacy. It is intended by it, that the decision of the Court shall be the basis of the judgment in the same manner as the verdict of a jury; and it follows, that without such decisión the judgment cannot stand. '

This cause is therefore reversed; and remanded for a new trial, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

F.People v. Monier
405 P.3d 1076 (California Supreme Court, 2017)
Crane v. First National Bank of McHenry
144 N.W. 96 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1913)
Insurance Co. of North America v. Taylor
1912 OK 463 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
Nichols v. Carter
49 Mo. App. 401 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1892)
Briggs v. Eggan
17 Kan. 589 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1877)
Lucas v. City of San Francisco
28 Cal. 591 (California Supreme Court, 1865)
Vermule v. Shaw
4 Cal. 214 (California Supreme Court, 1854)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Cal. 305, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russel-v-armador-cal-1852.