Russeau, Gregory

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 13, 2015
DocketAP-74,466
StatusPublished

This text of Russeau, Gregory (Russeau, Gregory) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Russeau, Gregory, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Smith County Courthouse LolS ROQSTS v_-_, (903)590-1675 100 N. Broadway, Room 204 ** Pax (903)590-16613 Tyler, Texas 75702 SlTlith COUIlty DiStNCt Clefk TTY/TDD (903) 535-0675

March 10,2015

Dear Mr. /Ms.

mmwmm RE:

GREGORY LYNN RUSSEAU MAg |9 £01! Polunsky Unit #0099430 3872 Fm 350 South Livingston, Texas 77351

Cause No.: 114-0750-02

Enclosed you will find:

FORMAL SENTENCING PURSAUNT TO MANDATE FROM THE TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

ORDER SETTING DATE OF EXECUTION

ORDER FOR ISSUANCE OF WARRANT OF EXECUTION

DEATH WARRANT

Sincerely,

Lois Rogers, Smith County District Clerk

Bv. U^^Cc^^^ta^ Linda Ruth Rhymes, Deputy CAUSE NUMBER 114-0750-02

THE STATE OF TEXAS ££ X IN T J&J& JUDICIAL VS. X DISTRICTtfcQ&RTii^ ^ GREGORY RUSSEAU SMITH COUNTY, \S

FORMAL SENTENCING PURSUANT TO MANDATE FROM TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ORDER SETTING DATE OF EXECUTION a ORDER FOR ISSUANCE OF WARRANT OF EXECUTION

Judge Presiding: Date of original sentence CHRIST! KENNEDY and Judgment: October 10, 2002 Date of subsequent sentencing and Judgment following remand from Court of Criminal Appeals: April 20, 2007 Date of formal sentencing upon Mandate affirming case and denial of 11.071 Writ Application and following denial of federal Writ Application by U.S. District Court and Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals: March 6, 2015

Attorney for State Attorney for Defendant: at trial: Jack Skeen Jr. at trial: Clifton Roberson Matt Bingham Brandon Baade Brett Harrison (1st trial)

Attorney for State Attorney for Defendant: at trials: Matt Bingham at trial: Clifton Roberson April Sikes Brandon Baade (2d punishment trial)

Attorney for State at Current Writ Counsel for formal sentencing: Defendant: Jeff Haas Matt Bingham April Sikes

CERTIFIED TO BE ATRUE AND CORRECT COPY FILED IN THE SMITH COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK'S OFFICE Offense Convicted of: Date Offense Committed:: Capital Murder May 30, 2001

Charging Instrument: Indictment Plea: Not Guilty

Terms of: Plea Bargain: None

Plea to Enhancements: None Finding on Enhancements: None

Findings oh Use of Deadly Weapon:: Not Applicable Enumerated Offense 3G

Date Sentence Pronounced: Court Costs: $14 9.50 October 10., 2 002

Date Sentence Formally Pronounced After Second Punishment Trial Following Remand from Court of Criminal Appeals: April 20, 2007 Date Sentence Formally Pronounced following Mandate from Texas Court of Griminal Appeals affirming Judgment and Sentence following denial of 11.07} writ application, and following denial by US District Court and Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals of federal writ application and setting first date of execution: March 6, 2015 DATE OF EXECUTION;; June 18, 2015 as provided by law Punishment: Date Set for Execution; Death by lethal injection June 1.8, .2.015 as as provided by law provided by law Place of Execution: As provided by law in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Institutional Division (formerly Texas Department of Corrections, State Penitentiary)

JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE UPON FORMAL SENTENCING WARRANT OF EXECUTION

_The Defendant having been indicted in the above numbered and entitled cause of action for the felony offense of Capital Murder was on the September 5, 2002 called for trial, the State appeared by her Criminal District Attorney, JACK M. SKEEN, JR. (together CERTIFIED TO BEATRUE ' AND CORRECT COPY FILED INTHE SMITH COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK'S OFFICE with his Assistant District Attorney, D. MATT BINGHAM ), and the Defendant, GREGORY RUSSEAU, appeared in person and with his counsel, CLIFTON ROBERSON and BRANDON BAADE-, and whereupon the State of Texas announced ready, the Defendant announced ready, and the jury selection was then and there commenced. Following jury selection, on September 30, 2002, the defendant, GREGORY RUSSEAU in open Court was duly arraigned arid in person pleaded NOT GUILTY to the charge contained in the indictment, and demanded his right to a trial by jury. The State having previously announced that it intended to seek, the death penalty upon any conviction of the defendant for the offense of Capital Murder, the case proceeded to trial. Up

_The Defendant, GREGORY RUSSEAU, having been found GUILTY of Capital Murder by the unanimous verdict of the Jury and thereupon, with the Defendant., GREGORY RUSSEAU, and all his counsel and counsel for the State being present in open Court, further evidence being heard by the jury on the special issues pertaining to punishment the Court again charged the jury as provided by law on •r^WrT- tSSUeS'of the retired m charge ThS proper JU±Y' aftSr hearl:ng officer *******their to consider of counsel, verdict and afterward were brought into open Court by the proper officer- lt;ant' GRffY RUSSEAU' *nd all his counsel being presen; along with counsel for the State., and in due form on October 10, 2002 said jury did return into open Court answers of "Yes " "Yes " and "No" to Special Issues One, Two and Three," respectively. ' DEATH^L^ ^ T °Ct0ber 10' 2002 Prono^ced sentence at RUSSEAU was asked by 1' RUSSEAU, wafrkH°K Court****** the "* whether^he Said defendant,to GREGORY had anything say why s:aid sentence should not be pronounced against him, subject to mandatory appeal and mandate, and he answered nothing at bar

CERTIFIED TO BE ATRUE AND CORRECT COPY FILED IN THE SMITH COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK'S OFFICE thereof, and the Court finding that the Defendant, GREGORY RUSSEAU, was at all applicable times and at that time mentally competent ana understanding of the English language, and the Court proceeded, then in the presence of the Defendant, GREGORY RUSSEAU and his counsel to pronounce sentence, subject to mandatory appeal, against him and signed a judgment to that effect.

The Court certified the record for appeal and an appeal to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals followed.^ Oh the June 29, 2005, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed Defendant GREGORY RUSSEAU's conviction, but vacated the sentence of death '• and remanded his case for a new punishment hearing. On remand, the trial court conducted a new punishment hearing. The Defendant, GREGORY RUSSEAU, having been found GUILTY of Capital Murder by the unanimous verdict of the first Jur-y, a second jury was selected, impaneled and sworn, thereupon, with the Defendant, GREGORY RUSSEAU, and all his counsel and counsel for the State being present in open Court, further evidence being heard by the jury on the special issues pertaining to punishment, the Court again charged the jury as provided by law on the special issues, and the jury, after hearing argument of counsel, retired in charge of the proper officer to consider their verdict and afterward were brought into open Court by the proper officer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Russeau, Gregory, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russeau-gregory-texapp-2015.