Russ v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Russ v. State

103 So. 926, 20 Ala. App. 694

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 17, 1925

Docket3 Div. 477.

StatusPublished

This text of 103 So. 926 (Russ v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Russ v. State, 103 So. 926, 20 Ala. App. 694 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMPORD, J.

There was sufficient evidence to submit this case to the jury, but no evidence as to venue. The affirmative charge was asked for defendant, but the fact that it was asked on account of a failure of proof as to venue was not brought to the attention of the trial court. This is not now an. open question in Alabama. Ray v. State, 16 Ala. App. 496, 79 So. 620; Watts v. State, 204 Ala. 372, 86 So. 70; Fondren v. State, 204 Ala. 451, 86 So. 71; Reaves v. State, 18 Ala. App. 5, 87 So. 705. We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMPORD, J.

There was sufficient evidence to submit this case to the jury, but no evidence as to venue. The affirmative charge was asked for defendant, but the fact that it was asked on account of a failure of proof as to venue was not brought to the attention of the trial court. This is not now an. open question in Alabama. Ray v. State, 16 Ala. App. 496, 79 So. 620; Watts v. State, 204 Ala. 372, 86 So. 70; Fondren v. State, 204 Ala. 451, 86 So. 71; Reaves v. State, 18 Ala. App. 5, 87 So. 705. We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

103 So. 926, 20 Ala. App. 694, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russ-v-state-alactapp-1925.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack