Russ & Russ P.C. v. Schadoff
This text of 798 N.E.2d 345 (Russ & Russ P.C. v. Schadoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the March 3, 2003 Appellate Division order, dismissed upon the ground that it does not lie, appellant having previously moved for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals from the Appellate Division order from which leave to appeal is currently sought (100 NY2d 577); motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the June 27, 2003 Supreme Court order, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution and thus does not constitute a final judgment within the meaning of CPLR 5602 (a) (1) (ii).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
798 N.E.2d 345, 100 N.Y.2d 606, 766 N.Y.S.2d 160, 2003 N.Y. LEXIS 2287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russ-russ-pc-v-schadoff-ny-2003.