Rusoff v. Hannafey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rusoff v. Hannafey

11 A.D.2d 723, 204 N.Y.S.2d 558, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9143

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 20, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 11 A.D.2d 723 (Rusoff v. Hannafey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rusoff v. Hannafey, 11 A.D.2d 723, 204 N.Y.S.2d 558, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9143 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries suffered in an automobile accident, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Bangs County, entered June 2, 1959, upon a decision awarding plaintiff $3,500, after trial by the court without a jury. Plaintiff contends that the amount is inadequate, in that no award was made for a mass of tissue present in plaintiff’s spinal cord which, it is contended, was caused by the accident. The medical witnesses differed as to whether this mass consisted of granulation tissue result[724]*724ing from injury in the automobile accident or whether it was a growth unrelated to the accident. Judgment affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Nolan) P. J., Ughetta, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries suffered in an automobile accident, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Bangs County, entered June 2, 1959, upon a decision awarding plaintiff $3,500, after trial by the court without a jury. Plaintiff contends that the amount is inadequate, in that no award was made for a mass of tissue present in plaintiff’s spinal cord which, it is contended, was caused by the accident. The medical witnesses differed as to whether this mass consisted of granulation tissue result[724]*724ing from injury in the automobile accident or whether it was a growth unrelated to the accident. Judgment affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Nolan) P. J., Ughetta, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 A.D.2d 723, 204 N.Y.S.2d 558, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rusoff-v-hannafey-nyappdiv-1960.