Rusk v. City of Irondale

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Rusk v. City of Irondale

564 So. 2d 478, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 941, 1990 WL 116387

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided June 15, 1990·No. 6 Div. 945·Published

Opinion

McMILLAN, Judge.

The appellant was convicted of driving under the influence and was fined $1500 fine and costs. He was also sentenced to 90 days of hard labor. The appellant filed [479] a notice of appeal but has failed to file a brief raising any issues or questions concerning his conviction or sentence. As this case was submitted on the record, and the appellant was determined not to be indigent, this appeal is dismissed pursuant to Rule 2(a)(2)(A), Alabama Rules of Appellate Procedure.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

All Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McMILLAN, Judge.

The appellant was convicted of driving under the influence and was fined $1500 fine and costs. He was also sentenced to 90 days of hard labor. The appellant filed [479] a notice of appeal but has failed to file a brief raising any issues or questions concerning his conviction or sentence. As this case was submitted on the record, and the appellant was determined not to be indigent, this appeal is dismissed pursuant to Rule 2(a)(2)(A), Alabama Rules of Appellate Procedure.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

All Judges concur.

Rusk v. City of Irondale, 564 So. 2d 478, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 941, 1990 WL 116387 (Ala. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

564 So. 2d 478 (Rusk v. City of Irondale) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.