Rusk v. City of Irondale

564 So. 2d 478, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 941, 1990 WL 116387
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
DecidedJune 15, 1990
Docket6 Div. 945
StatusPublished

This text of 564 So. 2d 478 (Rusk v. City of Irondale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rusk v. City of Irondale, 564 So. 2d 478, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 941, 1990 WL 116387 (Ala. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

McMILLAN, Judge.

The appellant was convicted of driving under the influence and was fined $1500 fine and costs. He was also sentenced to 90 days of hard labor. The appellant filed [479]*479a notice of appeal but has failed to file a brief raising any issues or questions concerning his conviction or sentence. As this case was submitted on the record, and the appellant was determined not to be indigent, this appeal is dismissed pursuant to Rule 2(a)(2)(A), Alabama Rules of Appellate Procedure.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

All Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
564 So. 2d 478, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 941, 1990 WL 116387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rusk-v-city-of-irondale-alacrimapp-1990.