Rusk ex rel. McGilvery v. Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa County

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Rusk ex rel. McGilvery v. Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa County

1994 OK 128, 885 P.2d 1365, 1994 Okla. LEXIS 148, 1994 WL 666160

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 22, 1994

DocketNo. 84433

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 1994 OK 128 (Rusk ex rel. McGilvery v. Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rusk ex rel. McGilvery v. Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa County, 1994 OK 128, 885 P.2d 1365, 1994 Okla. LEXIS 148, 1994 WL 666160 (Okla. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

[1366]*1366 ORDER

On the Court’s own motion, this appeal is dismissed as untimely. The petition in error was not mailed in compliance with 12 O.S.Supp.1993 § 990A and Rule 1.15 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure in Civil Cases in that it was mailed by priority mail rather than by certified mail, return receipt requested. The date of filing of the petition in error was the date it was received by the clerk rather than the date of mailing, which was more than 30 days after the fifing of the judgment. Eagle Life Ins. Co. v. Rush, 832 P.2d 1224 (Okl.1992), Woods v. Woods, 830 P.2d 1372 (Okl.1992).

/s/ Ralph B. Hodges CHIEF JUSTICE

HODGES, C.J., and SIMMS, OPALA, ALMA WILSON and SUMMERS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[1366]*1366 ORDER

On the Court’s own motion, this appeal is dismissed as untimely. The petition in error was not mailed in compliance with 12 O.S.Supp.1993 § 990A and Rule 1.15 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure in Civil Cases in that it was mailed by priority mail rather than by certified mail, return receipt requested. The date of filing of the petition in error was the date it was received by the clerk rather than the date of mailing, which was more than 30 days after the fifing of the judgment. Eagle Life Ins. Co. v. Rush, 832 P.2d 1224 (Okl.1992), Woods v. Woods, 830 P.2d 1372 (Okl.1992).

/s/ Ralph B. Hodges CHIEF JUSTICE

HODGES, C.J., and SIMMS, OPALA, ALMA WILSON and SUMMERS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1994 OK 128, 885 P.2d 1365, 1994 Okla. LEXIS 148, 1994 WL 666160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rusk-ex-rel-mcgilvery-v-independent-school-district-no-1-of-tulsa-county-okla-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack