Rushterfer v. Village of Tonawanda

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rushterfer v. Village of Tonawanda

76 N.Y.S. 1029

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 13, 1902

StatusPublished

This text of 76 N.Y.S. 1029 (Rushterfer v. Village of Tonawanda) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rushterfer v. Village of Tonawanda, 76 N.Y.S. 1029 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1902).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM. ‘

Judgment and order reversed, upon the ground that the damages are excessive, and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide event, unless the respondent within five days stipulates to reduce the verdict as of the date of its rendition to the sum of $1,500, in which event the judgment as thus modified and the order are affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM. ‘

Judgment and order reversed, upon the ground that the damages are excessive, and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide event, unless the respondent within five days stipulates to reduce the verdict as of the date of its rendition to the sum of $1,500, in which event the judgment as thus modified and the order are affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

76 N.Y.S. 1029, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rushterfer-v-village-of-tonawanda-nyappdiv-1902.