Rushmore v. Saxon

Second Circuit

Rushmore v. Saxon

170 F. 1021, 95 C.C.A. 671, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4789

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided June 16, 1909·No. No. 231·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We see no way to distinguish this case from the case of Rushmore v. Manhattan Screw & Stamping Works, 163 Fed. 940, decided by this court July 27, 1908. The decree should be modified by excluding from its provisions the direction for an accounting and injunction against the use of the words “Flare Front” in connection with the sale by the defendant of search-light lamps for automobiles. As so modified, the decree should be affirmed, with one-half costs of this court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We see no way to distinguish this case from the case of Rushmore v. Manhattan Screw & Stamping Works, 163 Fed. 940, decided by this court July 27, 1908. The decree should be modified by excluding from its provisions the direction for an accounting and injunction against the use of the words “Flare Front” in connection with the sale by the defendant of search-light lamps for automobiles. As so modified, the decree should be affirmed, with one-half costs of this court.

Rushmore v. Saxon, 170 F. 1021, 95 C.C.A. 671, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4789 (2d Cir. 1909).

Pincite

170 F. 1021 (Rushmore v. Saxon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related