Rushmore v. Saxon

Second Circuit

Rushmore v. Saxon

170 F. 1021, 95 C.C.A. 671, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4789

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedJune 16, 1909

DocketNo. 231

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 170 F. 1021 (Rushmore v. Saxon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rushmore v. Saxon, 170 F. 1021, 95 C.C.A. 671, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4789 (2d Cir. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We see no way to distinguish this case from the case of Rushmore v. Manhattan Screw & Stamping Works, 163 Fed. 940, decided by this court July 27, 1908. The decree should be modified by excluding from its provisions the direction for an accounting and injunction against the use of the words “Flare Front” in connection with the sale by the defendant of search-light lamps for automobiles. As so modified, the decree should be affirmed, with one-half costs of this court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We see no way to distinguish this case from the case of Rushmore v. Manhattan Screw & Stamping Works, 163 Fed. 940, decided by this court July 27, 1908. The decree should be modified by excluding from its provisions the direction for an accounting and injunction against the use of the words “Flare Front” in connection with the sale by the defendant of search-light lamps for automobiles. As so modified, the decree should be affirmed, with one-half costs of this court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

170 F. 1021, 95 C.C.A. 671, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4789, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rushmore-v-saxon-ca2-1909.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack