Rushmore v. Rushmore

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Rushmore v. Rushmore

176 A. 142, 117 N.J. Eq. 451, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 667

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedJanuary 10, 1935

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 176 A. 142 (Rushmore v. Rushmore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rushmore v. Rushmore, 176 A. 142, 117 N.J. Eq. 451, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 667 (N.J. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

We concur in the conclusion of the advisory master that the evidence establishes an abandonment of respondent by appellant under circumstances entitling her to separate maintenance. The allegation, made by appellant, that respondent has been guilty of a willful, continued and obstinate desertion, is not sustained by the proofs.

The decree is affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Paekee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hehee, Peeskie, Van Buskiek, Kays, Deae, Wells, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI