Rushmore v. Rushmore
168 A. 614, 114 N.J. Eq. 151, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 889
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Advisory Master Reed in the court of chancery.
For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, DEAR, WELLS, DILL, JJ. 12.
*Page 157For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rushmore v. Rushmore, 168 A. 614, 114 N.J. Eq. 151, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 889 (N.J. 1933).
168 A. 614 (Rushmore v. Rushmore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sullivan v. Sullivan
197 A.2d 910 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1964)
Maughan v. Maughan
184 N.E.2d 628 (Tuscarawas County Court of Common Pleas, 1961)
Wolff v. Wolff
34 A.2d 150 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1943)