Rushmore v. Miller

4 Edw. Ch. 84

Opinion

The Vice-Chancellor, decided that a surety, in such a case as the above, could not claim notice or a demand; and might be introduced as a defendant to fix him for any deficiency, without it.(b)

Footnotes

(b)

Although the late case of Gillett v. Balcom, 6 Barb. S. C. Rep. 370 has reference to a mortgage made on demand, yet it may be well to refer the reader to it.