Rushmore v. Miller
4 Edw. Ch. 84
This text of 4 Edw. Ch. 84 (Rushmore v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rushmore v. Miller, 4 Edw. Ch. 84 (N.Y. 1843).
Opinion
The Vice-Chancellor, decided that a surety, in such a case as the above, could not claim notice or a demand; and might be introduced as a defendant to fix him for any deficiency, without it.
Although the late case of Gillett v. Balcom, 6 Barb. S. C. Rep. 370 has reference to a mortgage made on demand, yet it may be well to refer the reader to it.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Averyt Drug Co. v. Ely-Robertson-Barlow Drug Co.
69 So. 931 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1915)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
4 Edw. Ch. 84, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rushmore-v-miller-nychanct-1843.