Rushing v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Rushing v. State

127 S.W.2d 900, 137 Tex. Crim. 102, 1939 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 318

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedMarch 22, 1939

DocketNo. 20283.

StatusPublished

This text of 127 S.W.2d 900 (Rushing v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rushing v. State, 127 S.W.2d 900, 137 Tex. Crim. 102, 1939 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 318 (Tex. 1939).

Pincite

Opinions

GRAVES, Judge.

The appellant was convicted of passing a forged instrument, .and was by the jury awarded three years confinement in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. The indictment appears to be in proper form, and all proceedings herein seem to be regular, and we have no other alternative than to affirm the judgment, which is accordingly done.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GRAVES, Judge.

The appellant was convicted of passing a forged instrument, .and was by the jury awarded three years confinement in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. The indictment appears to be in proper form, and all proceedings herein seem to be regular, and we have no other alternative than to affirm the judgment, which is accordingly done.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

127 S.W.2d 900, 137 Tex. Crim. 102, 1939 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rushing-v-state-texcrimapp-1939.