Rushing v. State

130 S.E. 358, 34 Ga. App. 525, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 386
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 11, 1925·No. 16777·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Luke, J.

The evidence in this case amply authorized the conviction. The conviction not being wholly dependent upon circumstantial evidence, and there being no request to charge thereon, the assignment of error upon the ground that the judge did not charge the law of circumstantial evidence is without merit. Eor no reason pointed out in the record did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloockoorth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rushing v. State, 130 S.E. 358, 34 Ga. App. 525, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 386 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

130 S.E. 358 (Rushing v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Perry v. State
145 S.E. 476 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)