Rushing v. State
This text of 218 So. 2d 481 (Rushing v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant was sentenced to life imprisonment for murder in 1959. He now appeals from an order denying his second motion for relief pursuant to Rule 1.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, 33 F.S.A. The sole ground for relief alleged is that he was deprived of the right to appeal the judgment of conviction in 1959.
Appellant’s petition fails to allege any error or irregularity in his trial; it was denied without hearing by the trial judge. We affirm for the reasons set forth in Murray v. State, Fla.App.1966, 191 So.2d 292; Nelson v. State, Fla.App.1968, 208 So.2d 506, 510; Pierson v. State, Fla.App.1968, 214 So.2d 17. See also Powe v. State, Fla. 1968, 216 So.2d 446 (opinion filed December 10, 1968).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
218 So. 2d 481, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rushing-v-state-fladistctapp-1969.