Rushing v. State

218 So. 2d 481
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 14, 1969·No. No. 68-447·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was sentenced to life imprisonment for murder in 1959. He now appeals from an order denying his second motion for relief pursuant to Rule 1.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, 33 F.S.A. The sole ground for relief alleged is that he was deprived of the right to appeal the judgment of conviction in 1959.

Appellant’s petition fails to allege any error or irregularity in his trial; it was denied without hearing by the trial judge. We affirm for the reasons set forth in Murray v. State, Fla.App.1966, 191 So.2d 292; Nelson v. State, Fla.App.1968, 208 So.2d 506, 510; Pierson v. State, Fla.App.1968, 214 So.2d 17. See also Powe v. State, Fla. 1968, 216 So.2d 446 (opinion filed December 10, 1968).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rushing v. State, 218 So. 2d 481 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).

218 So. 2d 481 (Rushing v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davis v. State
222 So. 2d 772 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)
Cypress Corporation of Florida v. Smith
218 So. 2d 481 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)