Rushing v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Opinion
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 19-397V
*************************
*
JANE B. RUSHING, * Chief Special Master Corcoran
*
Petitioner, * Filed: February 13, 2025
*
v. *
*
SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, *
*
Respondent. *
*
*************************
Nancy R. Meyers, Turning Point Litigation, Greensboro, NC, for Petitioner.
Sarah B. Rifkin, U.S. Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1
On March 14, 2019, Jane B. Rushing filed a petition seeking compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (the “Vaccine Program”). 2 Petitioner alleged that she suffered from Guillain-Barré syndrome as a result of her receipt of an influenza vaccine on November 20, 2012. Petition (ECF No. 1) at 1.
I issued an entitlement decision on February 16, 2024, ruling in Petitioner’s favor. See Ruling on Entitlement, dated Feb. 16, 2024 (ECF No. 62). On February 7, 2025, Respondent filed a proffer proposing an award of compensation. (ECF No. 80). I have reviewed the file, and based upon that review I conclude that Respondent’s proffer (as attached hereto) is reasonable. I therefore adopt it as my decision in awarding damages on the terms set forth therein.
1 Under Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has fourteen (14) days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the whole Decision will be available to the public in its present form. Id. 2 The Vaccine Program comprises Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3758, codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 through 34 (2012) (“Vaccine Act” or “the Act”). Individual section references hereafter will be to § 300aa of the Act (but will omit that statutory prefix).
The proffer awards:
• A lump sum payment of $393,710.34, representing compensation for life care expenses expected to be incurred during the first year after judgment ($148,745.77), pain and suffering ($220,000.00), and past unreimbursable expenses ($24,964.57), to be paid through an ACH deposit to Petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to Petitioner, Jane B. Rushing; and
• An amount sufficient to purchase an annuity contract, subject to the conditions described in the parties’ proffer, that will provide payments for the life care items contained in the life care plan, as illustrated by the chart at Tab A in the proffer.
Proffer at II. These amounts represent compensation for all elements of compensation under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a) to which Petitioners are entitled.
I approve a Vaccine Program award in the requested amount set forth above to be made to Petitioners. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment herewith. 3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master
3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by each filing (either jointly or separately) a notice renouncing their right to seek review.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
)
JANE B. RUSHING, )
)
Petitioner, )
) No. 19-397V
v. ) Chief Special Master Corcoran ) ECF
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN ) SERVICES, )
)
Respondent. )
)
RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
On March 14, 2019, Jane B. Rushing (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation
under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34
(“Vaccine Act” or “Act”), alleging that she suffered from Guillain-Barré syndrome as a result of
receiving the influenza vaccine on November 20, 2012. Petition, ECF No. 1. On February 16,
2024, Chief Special Master Corcoran issued an entitlement decision in favor of petitioner. ECF
No. 64. Respondent now proffers the following regarding the amount of compensation to be
awarded. 1
I. Items of Compensation
A. Life Care Items
Respondent engaged life care planner Linda Curtis RN, MS, CCM, CNLCP, and
petitioner engaged Ashley H. Johnson, MS, CRC, CLCP, to provide an estimation of petitioner’s
future vaccine-injury related needs. For the purposes of this proffer, the term “vaccine injury” is
1 The parties have no objection to the amount of the proffered award of damages. However, respondent reserves his right, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(e), to seek review of the Chief Special Master’s February 16, 2024, Ruling on Entitlement, finding petitioner entitled to an award under the Vaccine Act. This right accrues following the issuance of the damages decision.
as described in the Chief Special Master’s February 16, 2024, Ruling on Entitlement. All items
of compensation identified in the life care plan are supported by the evidence, and are illustrated
by the chart entitled Appendix A: Items of Compensation for Jane B. Rushing, attached hereto as
Tab A. Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded all items of compensation set
forth in the life care plan and illustrated by the chart attached at Tab A. 2 Petitioner agrees.
B. Pain and Suffering
Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $220,000.00 in actual and
projected pain and suffering. This amount reflects that any award for projected pain and
suffering has been reduced to net present value. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner
agrees.
C. Past Unreimbursable Expenses
Evidence supplied by petitioner documents her expenditure of past unreimbursable
expenses related to her vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that petitioner should be
awarded past unreimbursable expenses in the amount of $24,964.57. Petitioner agrees.
II. Form of the Award
The parties recommend that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made
through a combination of lump sum payments and future annuity payments as described below,
and request that the Chief Special Master’s decision and the Court’s judgment award the
following:3
2 The chart at Tab A illustrates respondent’s position on annual amounts for life care expenses. Annual benefit years run from the date of judgment up to the first anniversary of the date of judgment, and every year thereafter up to the anniversary of the date of judgment. 3 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering.
A. A lump sum payment of $393,710.34, representing compensation for life care
expenses expected to be incurred during the first year after judgment ($148,745.77), pain and
suffering ($220,000.00), and past unreimbursable expenses ($24,964.57), to be paid through an
ACH deposit to petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to petitioner,
Jane B. Rushing.
B. An amount sufficient to purchase an annuity contract,4 subject to the conditions
described below, that will provide payments for the life care items contained in the life care plan,
as illustrated by the chart at Tab A, attached hereto, paid to the life insurance company5 from
4 In respondent’s discretion, respondent may purchase one or more annuity contracts from one or more life insurance companies.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rushing v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Rushing v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.