Rushing v. Rushing
This text of 132 So. 3d 923 (Rushing v. Rushing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
This appeal is from a post-judgment order finding the former husband in contempt in a dissolution of marriage case. We dismiss the appeal because the order contemplates further judicial action to resolve the contempt claim fully. See Caribbean Fire & Assocs., Inc. v. Coastal Constr. Gr. of S. Fla., 985 So.2d 1197, 1199 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008); Grafman v. Grafman, 488 So.2d 115 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). This dismissal is without prejudice to the filing of a timely appeal once the judicial labor on the former wife’s motion for contempt and enforcement is complete. As a result of the dismissal, all pending motions are denied.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
132 So. 3d 923, 2014 WL 594383, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 2105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rushing-v-rushing-fladistctapp-2014.