Rushing v. Carter Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Rushing v. Carter Oil Co.

1932 OK 653, 15 P.2d 571, 160 Okla. 97, 1932 Okla. LEXIS 689

Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided October 4, 1932·No. 23506·Published

Opinion

McNEILL, J.

This is a proceeding to review an order and award of the State Industrial Commission. Attorneys for petitioner introduced their evidence before the Commission in support of their motion for further compensation on the ground of change of condition. The Commission found that the evidence was insufficient, and petitioner seeks to have this judgment reviewed. Suffice it to say that the Commission is the finder of facts. There is competent evidence to support the finding of facts, as made by tbe Commission, that the evidence was insufficient. Affirmed.

LESTER, C. J., CLARK, V. C. J., and RILEY, OULLISON, SWINDALL, ANDREWS, and KORNEGAY, JJ„ concur. HEENER, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McNEILL, J.

This is a proceeding to review an order and award of the State Industrial Commission. Attorneys for petitioner introduced their evidence before the Commission in support of their motion for further compensation on the ground of change of condition. The Commission found that the evidence was insufficient, and petitioner seeks to have this judgment reviewed. Suffice it to say that the Commission is the finder of facts. There is competent evidence to support the finding of facts, as made by tbe Commission, that the evidence was insufficient. Affirmed.

LESTER, C. J., CLARK, V. C. J., and RILEY, OULLISON, SWINDALL, ANDREWS, and KORNEGAY, JJ„ concur. HEENER, J., absent.

Rushing v. Carter Oil Co., 1932 OK 653, 15 P.2d 571, 160 Okla. 97, 1932 Okla. LEXIS 689 (Okla. 1932).

Pincite

1932 OK 653 (Rushing v. Carter Oil Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.