Rushing v. Carter Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Rushing v. Carter Oil Co.

1932 OK 653, 15 P.2d 571, 160 Okla. 97, 1932 Okla. LEXIS 689

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedOctober 4, 1932

Docket23506

StatusPublished

This text of 1932 OK 653 (Rushing v. Carter Oil Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rushing v. Carter Oil Co., 1932 OK 653, 15 P.2d 571, 160 Okla. 97, 1932 Okla. LEXIS 689 (Okla. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

McNEILL, J.

This is a proceeding to review an order and award of the State Industrial Commission. Attorneys for petitioner introduced their evidence before the Commission in support of their motion for further compensation on the ground of change of condition. The Commission found that the evidence was insufficient, and petitioner seeks to have this judgment reviewed. Suffice it to say that the Commission is the finder of facts. There is competent evidence to support the finding of facts, as made by tbe Commission, that the evidence was insufficient. Affirmed.

LESTER, C. J., CLARK, V. C. J., and RILEY, OULLISON, SWINDALL, ANDREWS, and KORNEGAY, JJ„ concur. HEENER, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McNEILL, J.

This is a proceeding to review an order and award of the State Industrial Commission. Attorneys for petitioner introduced their evidence before the Commission in support of their motion for further compensation on the ground of change of condition. The Commission found that the evidence was insufficient, and petitioner seeks to have this judgment reviewed. Suffice it to say that the Commission is the finder of facts. There is competent evidence to support the finding of facts, as made by tbe Commission, that the evidence was insufficient. Affirmed.

LESTER, C. J., CLARK, V. C. J., and RILEY, OULLISON, SWINDALL, ANDREWS, and KORNEGAY, JJ„ concur. HEENER, J., absent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1932 OK 653, 15 P.2d 571, 160 Okla. 97, 1932 Okla. LEXIS 689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rushing-v-carter-oil-co-okla-1932.