Rushing v. Barron

737 S.E.2d 377, 366 N.C. 412, 2012 N.C. LEXIS 1283, 2012 WL 6631770
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 12, 2012·No. 381P12·Published

Opinion

1. Pit’s NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA11-1471)

2. Pit’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

3. Def’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal

4. Def’s Motion to Strike Response to Motion to Dismiss

5. Pit’s Pro Se Motion to Deem Response to Motion to Dismiss Timely Filed

6. Pit’s Pro Se Motion for Additional Time to Obtain an Attorney to Reply in Full to Motion to Strike Response to Dismiss Appeal

1. - --
2. Denied
3. Allowed
4. Dismissed as Moot
5. Allowed
6. Denied

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rushing v. Barron, 737 S.E.2d 377, 366 N.C. 412, 2012 N.C. LEXIS 1283, 2012 WL 6631770 (N.C. 2012).

737 S.E.2d 377 (Rushing v. Barron) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 7A-31
North Carolina § 7A-31