Rushing v. Barron
737 S.E.2d 377, 366 N.C. 412, 2012 N.C. LEXIS 1283, 2012 WL 6631770
Opinion
1. Pit’s NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA11-1471)
2. Pit’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31
3. Def’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal
4. Def’s Motion to Strike Response to Motion to Dismiss
5. Pit’s Pro Se Motion to Deem Response to Motion to Dismiss Timely Filed
6. Pit’s Pro Se Motion for Additional Time to Obtain an Attorney to Reply in Full to Motion to Strike Response to Dismiss Appeal
1. - --
2. Denied
3. Allowed
4. Dismissed as Moot
5. Allowed
6. Denied
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rushing v. Barron, 737 S.E.2d 377, 366 N.C. 412, 2012 N.C. LEXIS 1283, 2012 WL 6631770 (N.C. 2012).
737 S.E.2d 377 (Rushing v. Barron) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
§ 7A-31
North Carolina § 7A-31