Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Rushin v. Winecoff

Rushin v. Winecoff

94 S.E.2d 755, 94 Ga. App. 413, 1956 Ga. App. LEXIS 560
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 4, 1956
Docket36372; 36381
StatusPublished

This text of 94 S.E.2d 755 (Rushin v. Winecoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rushin v. Winecoff, 94 S.E.2d 755, 94 Ga. App. 413, 1956 Ga. App. LEXIS 560 (Ga. Ct. App. 1956).

Opinion

Quillian, J.

Where a trial judge vacates his order overruling general and special demurrers to a petition, there has been no final judgment in the case and the filing of a bill of exceptions to this court is premature. Code § 6-701; Lankford v. Dockery, 84 Ga. App. 640 (66 S. E. 2d 840); Foster v. Sumner, 88 Ga. App. 5 (75 S. E. 2d 838). The present bills of exceptions fall within this ruling and hence are dismissed.

Writs of error dismissed.

Felton, C. J., and Nichols, J., concur. Saul Blau, for plaintiffs in error. W. Neal Baird, Hurt, Gaines & Baird, Peek & Peabody, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lankford v. Dockery
66 S.E.2d 840 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1951)
Foster v. Sumner
75 S.E.2d 838 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 S.E.2d 755, 94 Ga. App. 413, 1956 Ga. App. LEXIS 560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rushin-v-winecoff-gactapp-1956.