Rushin v. Winecoff

94 S.E.2d 755, 94 Ga. App. 413, 1956 Ga. App. LEXIS 560
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 4, 1956·No. 36372; 36381·Published

Opinion

Quillian, J.

Where a trial judge vacates his order overruling general and special demurrers to a petition, there has been no final judgment in the case and the filing of a bill of exceptions to this court is premature. Code § 6-701; Lankford v. Dockery, 84 Ga. App. 640 (66 S. E. 2d 840); Foster v. Sumner, 88 Ga. App. 5 (75 S. E. 2d 838). The present bills of exceptions fall within this ruling and hence are dismissed.

Writs of error dismissed.

Felton, C. J., and Nichols, J., concur. Saul Blau, for plaintiffs in error. W. Neal Baird, Hurt, Gaines & Baird, Peek & Peabody, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rushin v. Winecoff, 94 S.E.2d 755, 94 Ga. App. 413, 1956 Ga. App. LEXIS 560 (Ga. Ct. App. 1956).

94 S.E.2d 755 (Rushin v. Winecoff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lankford v. Dockery
66 S.E.2d 840 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1951)
Foster v. Sumner
75 S.E.2d 838 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)