Rushetsky v. Rushetsky

74 So. 3d 592, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 18660, 2011 WL 5864705
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 23, 2011·No. 4D10-2167·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The husband appeals a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. The failure to provide a transcript or proper substitute requires affirmance except where there is clear error on the face of the judgment. Matteis v. Matteis, — So.3d —, 2011 WL 4056288 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011); Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979). The wife concedes error in the $24 a month credit for noncovered medical expenses, as the child support guidelines worksheet also requires the husband to be 41% responsible for any noncovered medical expenses. As such, we reverse and remand for recalculation of child support without this credit. As to the other issues, we find no clear error on the face of the judgment and thus affirm.

*593 Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions.

TAYLOR, HAZOURI and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rushetsky v. Rushetsky, 74 So. 3d 592, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 18660, 2011 WL 5864705 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

74 So. 3d 592 (Rushetsky v. Rushetsky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee
377 So. 2d 1150 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)
Matteis v. Matteis
82 So. 3d 1048 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)