Rushetsky v. Rushetsky

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rushetsky v. Rushetsky

74 So. 3d 592, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 18660, 2011 WL 5864705

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 23, 2011

Docket4D10-2167

StatusPublished

This text of 74 So. 3d 592 (Rushetsky v. Rushetsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rushetsky v. Rushetsky, 74 So. 3d 592, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 18660, 2011 WL 5864705 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The husband appeals a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. The failure to provide a transcript or proper substitute requires affirmance except where there is clear error on the face of the judgment. Matteis v. Matteis, — So.3d —, 2011 WL 4056288 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011); Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979). The wife concedes error in the $24 a month credit for noncovered medical expenses, as the child support guidelines worksheet also requires the husband to be 41% responsible for any noncovered medical expenses. As such, we reverse and remand for recalculation of child support without this credit. As to the other issues, we find no clear error on the face of the judgment and thus affirm.

*593 Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions.

TAYLOR, HAZOURI and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The husband appeals a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. The failure to provide a transcript or proper substitute requires affirmance except where there is clear error on the face of the judgment. Matteis v. Matteis, — So.3d —, 2011 WL 4056288 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011); Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979). The wife concedes error in the $24 a month credit for noncovered medical expenses, as the child support guidelines worksheet also requires the husband to be 41% responsible for any noncovered medical expenses. As such, we reverse and remand for recalculation of child support without this credit. As to the other issues, we find no clear error on the face of the judgment and thus affirm.

*593 Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions.

TAYLOR, HAZOURI and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 So. 3d 592, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 18660, 2011 WL 5864705, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rushetsky-v-rushetsky-fladistctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack