Rusher v. Tomlinson
This text of 468 S.E.2d 57 (Rusher v. Tomlinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
E. Alan RUSHER and H & R Towing, Inc., Petitioners
v.
Eugene B. TOMLINSON, Chairman, North Carolina Coastal Resources Commission and North Carolina Coastal Resources Commission, Respondents, and
Atlantic Diving and Marine, Inc., Intervenor-Respondent.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Murchison, Taylor, Kendrick, Gibson & Davenport, L.L.P., by Alan D. McInnes and Michael Murchison, Wilmington, for petitioners-appellants.
*58 Michael F. Easley, Attorney General, by Robin W. Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Wilmington, for respondents-appellees.
Clark, Newton, Hinson & McLean, L.L.P., by Reid G. Hinson, for intervenor-respondent-appellee.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
468 S.E.2d 57, 343 N.C. 119, 1996 N.C. LEXIS 159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rusher-v-tomlinson-nc-1996.