Rushaid v. Pictet & Cie

71 N.E.3d 582, 28 N.Y.3d 1162, 2017 NY Slip Op 64336, 49 N.Y.S.3d 89, 2017 WL 628437, 2017 N.Y. LEXIS 179
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 16, 2017
StatusPublished

This text of 71 N.E.3d 582 (Rushaid v. Pictet & Cie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rushaid v. Pictet & Cie, 71 N.E.3d 582, 28 N.Y.3d 1162, 2017 NY Slip Op 64336, 49 N.Y.S.3d 89, 2017 WL 628437, 2017 N.Y. LEXIS 179 (N.Y. 2017).

Opinion

Motion by Swiss Bankers Association et al. for leave to appear amici curiae on the motion for reargument denied.

Judge Wilson taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
71 N.E.3d 582, 28 N.Y.3d 1162, 2017 NY Slip Op 64336, 49 N.Y.S.3d 89, 2017 WL 628437, 2017 N.Y. LEXIS 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rushaid-v-pictet-cie-ny-2017.