Rush v. Thompson
26 S.E.2d 411, 203 S.C. 106, 1943 S.C. LEXIS 84
This text of 26 S.E.2d 411 (Rush v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rush v. Thompson, 26 S.E.2d 411, 203 S.C. 106, 1943 S.C. LEXIS 84 (S.C. 1943).
Opinion
After a careful study and consideration of the record in this case, in the light of the issues made by the exceptions, and after considering the briefs of counsel, we are of'the opinion that the Circuit Court in its well-considered decree, correctly decided the case. We adopt that decree as the judgment of this Court. Let it be reported.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Civil Action No.: 2001-CP-32-0711 Carolina Water Service, Inc. v. Lexington County Joint Municipal Water & Sewer Commission
625 S.E.2d 227 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2006)
Van Every v. Chinquapin Hollow, Inc.
219 S.E.2d 909 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1975)
Dillon County v. Maryland Cas. Co.
67 S.E.2d 306 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1951)
Morris v. Lambert
62 S.E.2d 841 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1950)
Rush v. Thompson
38 S.E.2d 7 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1946)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
26 S.E.2d 411, 203 S.C. 106, 1943 S.C. LEXIS 84, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rush-v-thompson-sc-1943.