Rush v. State

4 So. 3d 679, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 548
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 28, 2009
DocketNo. 1D08-3530
StatusPublished

This text of 4 So. 3d 679 (Rush v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rush v. State, 4 So. 3d 679, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 548 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

DAVIS, BENTON, and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 So. 3d 679, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 548, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rush-v-state-fladistctapp-2009.