Rush v. Scott

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Rush v. Scott

1 Gunby 68

DecidedJuly 1, 1885

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Gunby 68 (Rush v. Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rush v. Scott, 1 Gunby 68 (La. Ct. App. 1885).

Pincite

Opinion

Farmer, J

Where documents are annexed to the petition and made part thereof, and endorsed “ filed in evidence,” they constitute a sufficient note of evidence, and the case will be considered on them. 31 An. 462.

2.Lawyers have no authority to consent to what judgment shall be rendered in a suit; but where a written agreement- of counsel is filed to that effect, the Court will presume that they have received special power from their clients, and act on the agreement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Farmer, J

Where documents are annexed to the petition and made part thereof, and endorsed “ filed in evidence,” they constitute a sufficient note of evidence, and the case will be considered on them. 31 An. 462.

2.Lawyers have no authority to consent to what judgment shall be rendered in a suit; but where a written agreement- of counsel is filed to that effect, the Court will presume that they have received special power from their clients, and act on the agreement.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Gunby 68, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rush-v-scott-lactapp-1885.