Rush v. Rush

29 Ohio St. 440
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 15, 1876·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

1. An action under the code for partition in which equitable relief is to be administered between the parties in order to effect a partition of the estate is appealable.

2. Where a suit which is appealable is disposed of in the court of common pleas on a demurrer to the petition, and an appeal taken by the plaintiff to the district court, the appeal can not be dismissed on the ground that the petition does not show a cause of action. The appellant has the right to have the judgment of the appellate court on the demurrer to his petition; and if the judgment is against him to ask leave to amend.

[441]*4413. Where it appears from the journal entries of the court, in such suit, that the demurrer tp the petition was sustained, and the “petition dismissed,” {he presumption is that the dismissal was by the court, and not the voluntary act of the plaintiff.

4. The judgment of dismissal in such ease is a final judgment from which an appeal may be taken.

Leave granted, judgment of the district court dismissing the appeal reversed, and cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rush v. Rush, 29 Ohio St. 440 (Ohio 1876).

29 Ohio St. 440 (Rush v. Rush) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thompson v. Moore, Trustee
53 N.E.2d 665 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1943)
DeRan v. Colonial Savings Co.
152 N.E. 303 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1925)
Search v. Pence
5 Ohio Cir. Dec. 689 (Miami Circuit Court, 1893)
Goldsborough v. Bolenbaugh
3 Ohio C.C. 583 (Ohio Circuit Courts, 1889)
Makemson v. Kauffman
35 Ohio St. (N.S.) 444 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1880)
Dodsworth v. Hopple
33 Ohio St. (N.S.) 16 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1877)