Rush v. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, LICENSING AND REGULATION

21 A.3d 123, 420 Md. 42, 2011 Md. LEXIS 363
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedJune 3, 2011
Docket138, September Term, 2010
StatusPublished

This text of 21 A.3d 123 (Rush v. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, LICENSING AND REGULATION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rush v. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, LICENSING AND REGULATION, 21 A.3d 123, 420 Md. 42, 2011 Md. LEXIS 363 (Md. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

ORDER.

The petition for writ of certiorari in the above-entitled case having been granted and argued, it is this 3rd day of June, 2011,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the writ of certiorari be, and it is hereby, dismissed with costs, the petition having been improvidently granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bradford v. State
21 A.3d 123 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 A.3d 123, 420 Md. 42, 2011 Md. LEXIS 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rush-v-department-of-labor-licensing-and-regulation-md-2011.