Rush v. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, LICENSING AND REGULATION
21 A.3d 123, 420 Md. 42, 2011 Md. LEXIS 363
Opinion
ORDER.
The petition for writ of certiorari in the above-entitled case having been granted and argued, it is this 3rd day of June, 2011,
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the writ of certiorari be, and it is hereby, dismissed with costs, the petition having been improvidently granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rush v. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, LICENSING AND REGULATION, 21 A.3d 123, 420 Md. 42, 2011 Md. LEXIS 363 (Md. 2011).
21 A.3d 123 (Rush v. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, LICENSING AND REGULATION) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bradford v. State
21 A.3d 123 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 2011)