Rush v. Cobbet

2 Yeates 275
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 15, 1798
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 Yeates 275 (Rush v. Cobbet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rush v. Cobbet, 2 Yeates 275 (Pa. 1798).

Opinion

By the court.

The .words of the act of congress, under which the present motion is founded, are, “ that the matter in dispute, “ exceeds the sum or value of 500 dollars, exclusive of costs, to be made to appear to the satisfaction of the court. ” It is not similar to the removal of an action inthe Court of Errors and Appeals of this state, under the "act of 13th April 1791, (3 Dall. St Laws, 98,) for these the affidavit of the party or his agent, that the matter in controversy exceeds 400 dollars, is declared to be sufficient. How can the court be satisfied, that the present cause of action exceeds 500 dollars, unless they can in a summary way estimate the damages in an action for a libel ? The law of congress meant to give them no such power, in torts, or vindictive suits. Its object was confined to property, where the value of the thing in controversy could be satisfactorily ascertained. It appears a singular circumstance in this cause, that while the defendant aggravates the damages arising from his own wrong, the plaintiff diminishes them. But it is certain, that the terms of the law cannot be complied with¿ should the present petition be granted. And therefore

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ogden v. Baker
13 N.J.L. 75 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1832)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Yeates 275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rush-v-cobbet-pa-1798.