Rush v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE VIL. OF SOUTH ORANGE
94 A.2d 548, 11 N.J. 327
This text of 94 A.2d 548 (Rush v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE VIL. OF SOUTH ORANGE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rush v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE VIL. OF SOUTH ORANGE, 94 A.2d 548, 11 N.J. 327 (N.J. 1953).
Opinion
MARSHALL F. RUSH, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE VILLAGE OF SOUTH ORANGE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND ARTHUR TZESES, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-PETITIONERS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mr. Daniel Leff for the petitioners.
Mr. Murray E. Kempler and Mr. Ward J. Herbert for the respondents.
Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Russell v. Tenafly Bd. of Adjustment
148 A.2d 78 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1959)
Bierce v. Gross
135 A.2d 561 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1957)
Barbarisi v. BD. OF ADJUSTMENT, CITY OF PATERSON
103 A.2d 164 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1954)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
94 A.2d 548, 11 N.J. 327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rush-v-board-of-adjustment-of-the-vil-of-south-orange-nj-1953.