Rush v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE VIL. OF SOUTH ORANGE

94 A.2d 548, 11 N.J. 327
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 2, 1953·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

11 N.J. 327 (1953)

MARSHALL F. RUSH, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE VILLAGE OF SOUTH ORANGE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND ARTHUR TZESES, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-PETITIONERS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

February 2, 1953.

Mr. Daniel Leff for the petitioners.

Mr. Murray E. Kempler and Mr. Ward J. Herbert for the respondents.

Denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rush v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE VIL. OF SOUTH ORANGE, 94 A.2d 548, 11 N.J. 327 (N.J. 1953).

94 A.2d 548 (Rush v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE VIL. OF SOUTH ORANGE) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Russell v. Tenafly Bd. of Adjustment
148 A.2d 78 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1959)
Bierce v. Gross
135 A.2d 561 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1957)
Barbarisi v. BD. OF ADJUSTMENT, CITY OF PATERSON
103 A.2d 164 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1954)