Rush v. Astro Container Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Rush v. Astro Container Co.

1999 Ohio 273, 85 Ohio St. 3d 362

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 28, 1999

Docket1998-1843

StatusPublished

This text of 1999 Ohio 273 (Rush v. Astro Container Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rush v. Astro Container Co., 1999 Ohio 273, 85 Ohio St. 3d 362 (Ohio 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 85 Ohio St.3d 362.]

RUSH, APPELLEE, v. ASTRO CONTAINER COMPANY, APPELLANT. [Cite as Rush v. Astro Container Co., 1999-Ohio-273.] Employer and employee—Cause of action brought by employee alleging intentional tort by employer in workplace—R.C. 2945.01 is unconstitutional in its entirety—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on authority of Johnson v. BP Chemicals, Inc. (No. 98-1843—Submitted March 31, 1999—Decided April 28, 1999.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County, No. C-970759. __________________ Manley, Burke, Lipton & Cook and Andrew S. Lipton, for appellee. Dinsmore & Shohl L.L.P. and George B. Wilkinson, for appellant. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Johnson v. BP Chemicals, Inc. (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 298, 707 N.E.2d 1107. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., concur. LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents. __________________ LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I respectfully dissent for the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in Johnson v. BP Chemicals, Inc. (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 298, 707 N.E.2d 1107. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 85 Ohio St.3d 362.]

RUSH, APPELLEE, v. ASTRO CONTAINER COMPANY, APPELLANT. [Cite as Rush v. Astro Container Co., 1999-Ohio-273.] Employer and employee—Cause of action brought by employee alleging intentional tort by employer in workplace—R.C. 2945.01 is unconstitutional in its entirety—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on authority of Johnson v. BP Chemicals, Inc. (No. 98-1843—Submitted March 31, 1999—Decided April 28, 1999.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County, No. C-970759. __________________ Manley, Burke, Lipton & Cook and Andrew S. Lipton, for appellee. Dinsmore & Shohl L.L.P. and George B. Wilkinson, for appellant. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Johnson v. BP Chemicals, Inc. (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 298, 707 N.E.2d 1107. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., concur. LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents. __________________ LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I respectfully dissent for the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in Johnson v. BP Chemicals, Inc. (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 298, 707 N.E.2d 1107. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1999 Ohio 273, 85 Ohio St. 3d 362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rush-v-astro-container-co-ohio-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack