Rush, M. v. Erie Insurance Exchange, Pet
This text of Rush, M. v. Erie Insurance Exchange, Pet (Rush, M. v. Erie Insurance Exchange, Pet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
MATTHEW RUSH AND KATHLEEN : No. 37 MAL 2022 MCGROGAN-RUSH, : : Respondents : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court : v. : : : ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE, : : Petitioner :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 27th day of June, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:
Whether the decision of the three-judge panel of the Superior Court is in direct conflict with the Pennsylvania Supreme Court decisions in Burstein v. Prudential Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 809 A.2d 204 (Pa. 2002) and Williams v. GEICO Gov’t Emps. Ins. Co., 32 A.3d 1195 (Pa. 2011) and whether the Superior Court erred as a matter of law by finding that the “regular use exclusion” contained in Pennsylvania auto insurance policies violates the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law, 75 Pa.C.S.[ ] [§] 1701, et. seq.[.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rush, M. v. Erie Insurance Exchange, Pet, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rush-m-v-erie-insurance-exchange-pet-pa-2022.