Rush, Ex Parte Deon

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 19, 2011
DocketAP-76,667
StatusPublished

This text of Rush, Ex Parte Deon (Rush, Ex Parte Deon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rush, Ex Parte Deon, (Tex. 2011).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NOS. AP-76,666 & AP-76,667

EX PARTE DEON RUSH, Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 16,022 & 16,024 IN THE 506TH DISTRICT COURT FROM GRIMES COUNTY

Per curiam.

OPINION

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex

parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of two counts

of burglary of a habitation and sentenced to eighteen years’ imprisonment on each count. The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals dismissed his appeals. Rush v. State, Nos. 14-09-00434-CR & 14-09-

00453-CR (Tex. App.–Houston [14th Dist.] July 9, 2009, no pet.).

Applicant contends, among other things, that he was denied his right to appeal. We remanded

these applications to the trial court for findings of fact and conclusions of law. The trial court has 2

determined that Applicant was denied his right to appeal and recommended that we grant Applicant

out-of-time appeals. We find that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file out-of-time appeals

of the judgments of conviction in cause numbers 16,022 and 16,024 from the 506th District Court

of Grimes County. Applicant is ordered returned to that time at which he may give written notices

of appeal so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain meaningful appeals. Within ten days

of the issuance of this opinion, the trial court shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If he is

indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall immediately appoint an

attorney to represent him on direct appeal. All time limits shall be calculated as if the sentences had

been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant

desire to prosecute appeals, he must take affirmative steps to file written notices of appeal in the trial

court within 30 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Applicant’s remaining claim is dismissed. Ex parte Torres, 943 S.W.2d 469 (Tex. Crim.

App. 1997).

Delivered: October 19, 2011 Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Torres
943 S.W.2d 469 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1997)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Rush, Ex Parte Deon, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rush-ex-parte-deon-texcrimapp-2011.