Rusesabagina v. Republic of Rwanda
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
PAUL RUSESABAGINA, et al., )
)
Plaintiffs )
)
v. ) Civil Case No. 22-469 (RJL)
)
THE REPUBLIC OF RWANDA, et al., )
)
Defendants )
)
MEMO�UM OPINION
January Q\3, 2023 [Dkt. ## 18, 25]
Plaintiffs Paul Rusesabagina ("Rusesabagina"), his wife, and his six children (collectively, "plaintiffs") have sued the Republic of Rwanda, its President, Paul Kagame, and three Rwandan officials for harms stemming from Rusesabagina's alleged kidnapping, torture, and detention. Now before the Court are motions to dismiss filed by Rwanda and President Kagame. All plaintiffs' claims against those defendants are barred by foreign sovereign immunity and head of state immunity. Therefore, I will GRANT Rwanda's [Dkt. # 18] and President Kagame's [Dkt. # 25] Motions to Dismiss.
BACKGROUND
I. Factual Background Except where otherwise noted, the recitation of facts is drawn from the Amended Complaint. See Am. Compl. ("Compl.") [Dkt. #17]. In resolving a motion to dismiss, the
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rusesabagina v. Republic of Rwanda (Rusesabagina v. Republic of Rwanda) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.