Ruse v. Ruse

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ruse v. Ruse

351 So. 2d 81

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 28, 1977

DocketNo. EE-343

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 351 So. 2d 81 (Ruse v. Ruse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ruse v. Ruse, 351 So. 2d 81 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of an award of $4,000 as lump sum alimony as ordered in a final judgment in a dissolution of marriage proceeding in which the experienced and able trial judge specifically found “that the husband is able to pay the same”. The final judgment here sought to be reversed is fully sustained by this court’s opinion in Brown v. Brown, 300 So.2d 719 (Fla.1st DCA 1974) which, unless and until receded from by this court constitutes a binding precedent on the trial court as well as this court. The final judgment appealed is therefore

AFFIRMED.

BOYER, Acting C. J., and ERVIN, J., concur. MILLS, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of an award of $4,000 as lump sum alimony as ordered in a final judgment in a dissolution of marriage proceeding in which the experienced and able trial judge specifically found “that the husband is able to pay the same”. The final judgment here sought to be reversed is fully sustained by this court’s opinion in Brown v. Brown, 300 So.2d 719 (Fla.1st DCA 1974) which, unless and until receded from by this court constitutes a binding precedent on the trial court as well as this court. The final judgment appealed is therefore

AFFIRMED.

BOYER, Acting C. J., and ERVIN, J., concur. MILLS, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

351 So. 2d 81, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruse-v-ruse-fladistctapp-1977.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack