Rusconi v. United States

74 F. Supp. 669, 1947 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1918
CourtDistrict Court, S.D. California
DecidedJuly 28, 1947
Docket7046-WM
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 74 F. Supp. 669 (Rusconi v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rusconi v. United States, 74 F. Supp. 669, 1947 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1918 (S.D. Cal. 1947).

Opinion

MATHES, District Judge.

This cause having heretofore come before the court for hearing on motion of Employers’ Fire Insurance Company, a corporation, The Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, a corporation, and Westchester Fire Insurance Company, a corporation, for leave to intervene as parties plaintiff, and the motion having been heard and submitted for decision, and it appearing to the court that the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 931, does not expressly grant consent to suit by the subrogee of a claimant, See 31 U.S.C.A. § 203, and that consent of the Government to be sued, being a relinquishment of sovereign immunity, must be strictly interpreted (United States v. Sherwood, 1940, 312 U.S. 584, 590, 61 S.Ct. 767, 85 L.Ed. 1058; Defense Supplies Corporation v. United States Lines Co., 2 Cir., 1945, 148 F,2d 311, 312) ; it is now ordered that the motion of Employers’ Fire Insurance Company, a corporation, The Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, a corporation, and Westchester Fire Insurance Company, a corporation, for leave to intervene as parties plaintiff in this action be and is hereby denied.

It is further ordered that the Clerk this day forward copies of this order by United States mail to the attorneys for the parties appearing in this cause.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Newsum v. Pennsylvania R. Co.
79 F. Supp. 225 (S.D. New York, 1948)
South Carolina State Highway Department v. United States
78 F. Supp. 594 (E.D. South Carolina, 1948)
Van Wie v. United States
77 F. Supp. 22 (N.D. Iowa, 1948)
Niagara Fire Ins. Co. v. United States
76 F. Supp. 850 (S.D. New York, 1948)
Grace Ex Rel. Grangers Mut. Ins. v. United States
76 F. Supp. 174 (D. Maryland, 1948)
Town of Amherst v. United States
77 F. Supp. 80 (W.D. New York, 1948)
Wojciuk v. United States
74 F. Supp. 914 (E.D. Wisconsin, 1947)
Bewick v. United States
74 F. Supp. 730 (N.D. Texas, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 F. Supp. 669, 1947 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1918, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rusconi-v-united-states-casd-1947.