Ruscon Construction Corporation v. Acrow Carolina, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Ruscon Construction Corporation v. Acrow Carolina, Inc.

402 F.2d 989

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 4, 1968·No. 12373·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The issues which arose in this case between a general contractor and his subcontractor are chiefly factual. There was conflict in the evidence which the District Judge resolved in a manner substantially supported in the record. We cannot say that his findings are clearly erroneous,. and we find no error in the interpretation of the contract between the parties or other error of law.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The issues which arose in this case between a general contractor and his subcontractor are chiefly factual. There was conflict in the evidence which the District Judge resolved in a manner substantially supported in the record. We cannot say that his findings are clearly erroneous,. and we find no error in the interpretation of the contract between the parties or other error of law.

Affirmed.

Ruscon Construction Corporation v. Acrow Carolina, Inc., 402 F.2d 989 (4th Cir. 1968).

Pincite

402 F.2d 989 (Ruscon Construction Corporation v. Acrow Carolina, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.