Ruscigno v. Royal Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ruscigno v. Royal Insurance

246 A.D. 542

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 15, 1935·Published

Opinion

Action on a policy of fire insurance. Order confirming the report of the official referee, holding that the service of process on the defendant was valid, denying defendant’s motion to vacate the service of the summons and requiring the defendant to appear generally, affirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Scudder, Tompkins, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action on a policy of fire insurance. Order confirming the report of the official referee, holding that the service of process on the defendant was valid, denying defendant’s motion to vacate the service of the summons and requiring the defendant to appear generally, affirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Scudder, Tompkins, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Ruscigno v. Royal Insurance, 246 A.D. 542 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

246 A.D. 542 (Ruscigno v. Royal Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.