Rusciano v. State
543 So. 2d 449, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2886, 1989 WL 53352
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 24, 1989
DocketNo. 88-1321
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 543 So. 2d 449 (Rusciano v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rusciano v. State, 543 So. 2d 449, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2886, 1989 WL 53352 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
Opinion
The circuit court erred in summarily denying appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief without holding an evidentiary hearing or attaching to its order that portion of the record which conclusively demonstrates that appellant is entitled to no relief. See Gentry v. State, 464 So.2d 659 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). Accordingly, we reverse and remand.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In Re Estate of Warwick
543 So. 2d 449 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
543 So. 2d 449, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2886, 1989 WL 53352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rusciano-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.