Rusch v. The Martin Condo. Unit Owners' Ass'N
This text of Rusch v. The Martin Condo. Unit Owners' Ass'N (Rusch v. The Martin Condo. Unit Owners' Ass'N) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
WESLEY RUSCH, AN INDIVIDUAL, No. 85108 Appellant,
vs, FILED
THE MARTIN CONDOMINIUM UNIT
OWNERS' ASSOCIATION, DOMESTIC AUG 08 2022 NON-PROFIT, cLIZABETHA Resp ondent. CLERK OF SUPREME COURT
BY DEPUTY CLERK
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order dismissing a complaint. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Nancy L. Allf, Judge.
Review of the notice of appeal and documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. The notice of appeal was prematurely filed in the district court after the filing of a timely tolling motion for reconsideration but before that motion was resolved by the district court in a written order. See NRAP 4(a)(4) (regarding tolling motions); AA Primo Builders LLC v. Washington, 126 Nev. 578, 585, 245 P.3d 1190, 1195 (2010) (describing when a post-judgment motion carries tolling effect). To date, it appears that motion remains pending in the district court. This court lack
jurisdiction over a premature notice of appeal. NRAP 4(a)(6). Accordingly,
this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED. 5 Luor J. ° Silver J. Jd. Cadish Pickering
SupREME CouRT OF NEVADA
(OQ) (947A ABR a a
cc: Hon. Nancy L. Allf, District Judge Wesley Rusch Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk
(0) 1947A 2B 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rusch v. The Martin Condo. Unit Owners' Ass'N, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rusch-v-the-martin-condo-unit-owners-assn-nev-2022.