Rusch v. Melosh
36 A.2d 8, 134 N.J. Eq. 409, 1944 N.J. LEXIS 427
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Egan, and reported at
For reversal — PARKER, CASE, COLIE, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, DILL, JJ. 6.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rusch v. Melosh, 36 A.2d 8, 134 N.J. Eq. 409, 1944 N.J. LEXIS 427 (N.J. 1944).
36 A.2d 8 (Rusch v. Melosh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re Estate of Dunning
246 A.2d 142 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1968)
In Re Estate of Laise
87 A.2d 362 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1952)
The Paterson Savings Institution v. Degray
42 A.2d 264 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1945)
Ricardo v. Kelly
41 A.2d 901 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1945)